Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: shunsuke (pstade.mb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-09 04:21:03

Next message: Yingwei Zhang: "[boost] How to create boost rpm"
Previous message: Giovanni Piero Deretta: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"
In reply to: Sergey Shandar: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"
Next in thread: Sergey Shandar: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"
Reply: Sergey Shandar: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"
Reply: Sergey Shandar: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"
Reply: Sergey Shandar: "Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a casting library where you don't need to specify a type of receiver?"

Sergey Shandar wrote:
> 3. I found this one today:
>
> template<class T>
> operator T &() const
> throw(typename ::boost::disable_if< ::boost::is_same<T, MyClass
> const> >::type *)

You've solved the millenium problem! :-)

gcc3.4.5 and 4.1.2 seem to work fine.
Thanks!

-- 
Shunsuke Sogame

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view