Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Deterimining interest in: Optional Polymorphic Value object with Small Object optimization

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-20 11:47:39

Next message: Marco: "Re: [boost] [dynamic overload] proof of concept implementation - new version available"
Previous message: Joel de Guzman: "[boost] [Fusion] Onward towards 2.1"
In reply to: Corrado Zoccolo: "[boost] Deterimining interest in: Optional Polymorphic Value object with Small Object optimization"
Next in thread: Simon Francis: "Re: [boost] Deterimining interest in: Optional Polymorphic Value object with Small Object optimization"
Reply: Simon Francis: "Re: [boost] Deterimining interest in: Optional Polymorphic Value object with Small Object optimization"
Reply: Corrado Zoccolo: "Re: [boost] Deterimining interest in: Optional Polymorphic Value object with Small Object optimization"

So, is this more a boost::any with SBO or a boost::optional that can
store polymorphic types if necessary?

It seems to me like it is the latter. That sounds useful, but right now
I'd need the former.

Sebastian Redl

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view