From: Roland Schwarz (roland.schwarz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-12 04:47:44
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> The answer is still no. The standard says (9.2/16):
Ok, I think I got the point. I think the situation is even
worse than I initially was thinking of:
So even in the following case where T is an POD-object type:
struct U { T t; };
and when sizeof(T) == sizeof(U)
I am allowed to:
T t;
U u1;
U u2;
memcpy(&t,&u1,sizeof(T);
memcpy(&u2,&t,sizeof(T);
and rely on u1 == u2, but may not rely on:
t == u1 or t == u2, because there are no
guarantees about value representation guarantees
between U and T.
Correct?
Roland aka speedsnail