Re: [boost] An attempt to generalize the Pimpl idom with properly separated interface and implementation

From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-07 10:16:14

Vladimir Batov wrote:

> Well, I feel that "the massive overhead" is debatable.

Size overhead, runtime overhead, multi-threading issues due to sharing...

> Well, I am not sure I can agree as sharing certainly can be done when data 
> are not read-only.

Of course, but in that case it's not just a mere implementation detail, 
as what pimpl is.