From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-05 19:30:04
John Femiani wrote:
> Array access has it own problems; I think we would need to accommodate
> both.
Yes!
> I am not too familiar with fusion; but I have used GIL which has
> concepts for heterogeneous as well as homogeneous types. The most
> generic type of access is obtained by something like the get<> template
> function below (but GIL calls it at_c<>).
Fusion calls it at_c<N> too, FWIW. As do MPL. get<N> is just a synonym
for backward compatibility with TR1 tuple.
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net