From: Robert Kawulak (kawulak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-11 12:08:53
> From: Phil Endecott
> Michael Marcin wrote:
> > Phil Endecott wrote:
> > RVCT 2.2 with --arm and -O2
> It looks like your compiler is not inlining full_add inside
> no_overflow, and is doing a lot of spurious argument save/restore.
This is what I've recently learnt from Mathias:
> From: Mathias Gaunard
> Robert Kawulak wrote:
> > I compiled it with gcc 4.01, optimisations turned on. I had
> > to add explicit 'inline' to several functions
> Aggressive inlining should be enabled with -O3.
Having glanced at the manual I suppose this should also work with RVCT. ;-)
Best regards,
Robert