From: Stjepan Rajko (stipe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-31 12:17:58
On 8/31/07, John Maddock <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Looks like I quashed most of the problems, but still missed a few, also
> looks like expl is inaccurate on that platform? Can you check what
> std::exp(-8072.0L) evaluates to: should be
> 2.371057450122979885196291188186517859e-3506 according to
> functions.wolfram.com.
>
It's:
2.371057450122979876482639519674937e-3506
Best regards,
Stjepan