From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-24 14:47:29
Robert Ramey wrote:
> If anyone can't wait for a Boost threadsafe
> singleton, they can substitute my trivial one
> for one of their own choosing.
>
Thats a step in the right direction!
> That is, I'm offloading this issue to anyone else
>
How about a different way to think about the problem?
As I recall, the problem with the thread-safety of the serialization
library relates to setting up the type info maps. If you could somehow
create a way that one could invoke the setup of this map perhaps by a
function call, that would solve the problem, yes?
Thanks for looking at the problem in any case.
Sohail