From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-22 15:41:06
AMDG
Alexander Nasonov <alnsn <at> yandex.ru> writes:
> Actually, this contruct has a limitation too. In some cases, typename
> is required:
>
> template<class T>
> void foo()
> {
> T& (*function_tag)() = 0;
> typedef typename remove_reference<BOOST_TYPEOF(function_tag)>::type sig;
> }
>
Can't you use the same mechanism that you use
to avoid typename for the plain typeof?
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe