From: Nicola Musatti (Nicola.Musatti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-10 09:03:56
Doug Gregor <dgregor <at> osl.iu.edu> writes:
> On Aug 8, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Nicola Musatti wrote:
[...]
> > Maybe so, but then why aren't branches and tags organized in the
> > same way?
>
> Because cvs2svn converted it with everything inside "trunk/boost",
> "branches/RC_1_34_0/boost", etc. and I only went in and fixed the
> trunk. Someone should go in and patch up the other branches, so we
> don't have the extra, nested "boost".
I'm beginning to understand why Daniel Wallin was so eager to remove old
branches ;-)
Thanks for the explanation!
Cheers,
Nicola Musatti