From: Michael Marcin (mmarcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-08-09 23:31:47
Eric Niebler wrote:
>
> Thought: it occurs to me that commit() is a bad name. It is evocative of
> transactional semantics, which is not necessarily accurate. What I'm
> looking for is a way to signal the end of an input sequence, such that
> *if* the series has decided to buffer the input, it now knows it has
> received it all. It doesn't *have* to buffer the input, though. Maybe
> done() or end() or even eof().
>
flush()?
- Michael Marcin