From: Stefan Seefeld (seefeld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-20 16:44:09
Phillip Hellewell wrote:
> On 7/20/07, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Michael Caisse wrote:
>>> How about using boost::shared_ptr. Something like this in your class
>> instead:
>>> boost::shared_ptr< boost::recursive_mutex > myMutex;
>> Then you would protect both copies of the resource that is part of the
>> class
>> by a single (shared) mutex. That doesn't sound right.
>>
>
> Exactly, I don't want to copy or share the mutex in any way. I want each
> object to have its own mutex.
Right. And how do you think the compiler will know that ?
Regards,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...