From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-07-08 15:22:59
On 07/08/2007 09:42 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
[snip]
> now that it can't really know, so I should break this up into separate
> construct<> and pod_construct<> transforms.
>
Thanks Eric. I starting looking for some typedef in proto::expr
and tried "overriding" the:
typedef expr proto_derived_expr;
in proto::expr<> with:
typedef wrap proto_derived_expr;
in wrap, but that didn't work. I was planning on looking further;
however, I guess I'd better just wait for a revised construct<>.
Your last message just saved me, probably, a lot of time.
Thanks again.
Could you let me know when the revised construct<>
is ready?
TIA.
-Larry