From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-29 09:32:15
Daniel James wrote:
> I've seen the proposal to remove destroy, construct and address, and I
> think it's a good idea but it seems premature to remove them before the
> change has even been added to a draft standard.
Yes, it was a bit premature, but I didn't know anyone was using
unordered+interprocess.
I can add construct/destroy again to the allocators to make them
compatible (I'm preparing a new version for the next week), but avoiding
construct/destroy in unordered containers might be good idea to clean up
a bit the implementation once the removal is added to the draft.
Regards,
Ion