From: Oliver.Kowalke_at_[hidden]
Date: 2007-05-14 01:49:00
> > Nice - but I don't know why posix errors are enumerated now.
>
> The LWG wanted them to be usable as constants.
I believe that will cause problems because EAGAIN could have the same
value as EWOULDBLOCK (for instance LINUX).
> > Maybe some
> > posix errors are missing (I'm not sure).
>
> Please do an independent check. I have missed something. The
> POSIX folks suggested adding a couple of new errors POSIX is
> in process of adding, by the way.
ESTALE
ENXIO
EMULTIHOP
EDQUOT
EAI_ADDRFAMILY
EAI_AGAIN
EAI_BADFLAGS
EAI_FAIL
EAI_FAMILY
EAI_MEMORY
EAI_NODATA
EAI_NONAME
EAI_SERVICE
EAI_SOCKTYPE
EAI_SYSTEM
Oliver