From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-02 06:35:24
on Tue May 01 2007, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov-AT-mmltd.net> wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>
>> BTW, I don't know if this has been discussed much, but the plan for
>> subversion switchover, as I understand it, is to take 1.34 as the svn
>> HEAD and force all work unstable stuff on the CVS HEAD to be brought
>> over using the new process.
>
> That would be very impolite. :-)
I'm not sure this transition *can* be a "polite" process if it's going
to work. That said, I'm open to suggestions.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com Don't Miss BoostCon 2007! ==> http://www.boostcon.com