Re: [boost] proto::tag naming convention

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-27 16:25:40

Larry Evans wrote:
> why not
> do the following renames:
> 
>    proto::_       -> proto::true_
> 
>    proto::not_<_> -> proto::false_
> 
> ?

No, proto::_ is a placeholder. And proto::not_<> can logically negate 
any grammar, not just proto::_.

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com