From: Jody Hagins (jody-boost-011304_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-04-01 11:33:02
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:08:00 +0200
JD <jean.daniel.michaud_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Here is a couple of ideas I have glanced from previous threads:
Having done you research is a great start. As you can see, the opinions
differ widely. I think you have to have a simple interface that is
efficient and easy to use. However, you also need a way to offer
extensive customizations. This is the hard part, and where the real
problem exists.
> I think this is where troubles starts. As I said, the logging library
> shall be simple to the cost of not being configurable at first. After
> inclusion to boost, it can get better. Yes, it looks like petty
> politics, but how come there is no logging library into boost with all
>
> the interest it has in the past then ?
I think because there could not be a good enough agreement. You have to
bring a very good library, with a polished argument. OR... you have to
be willing to endure the lengthy discussions that will lead to such.