From: Eric Lemings (eric.lemings_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-31 00:01:55
On Mar 30, 2007, at 5:59 PM, me22 wrote:
> ...
> second(1)' is much uglier than '9.8 * metres / (second*second)' for no
> apparent gain.
If '9.8 * metres / (second*second)' is a valid expression, then
'metres/(second*second)'
must also be a valid expression. What is the result of the latter?
Eric.