Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-24 18:58:16

Yuval Ronen wrote:

> That's it's not good C++. We are designing a C++ interface here, and
> we want to take advantage of all the nice things C++ has to offer, as
> Sohail pointed out. N2184 is better at using all those nice things,
> IMO.

N2184 is closer to pthreads than the C++ portion of N2178 is, FWIW. But 
don't let that stop you.