$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost/include";
include("$include_dir/msg-header.inc")
?>
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- In reply to: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
Sohail Somani wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
>> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Martin Wille
>
>> Why?
>>
>> Users of the POSIX API wouldn't want to adjust their existing
>> code for
>> it. (As a side node, there seems to be significant resistance against
>> adding shallow C++ wrappers around POSIX functions in the POSIX C++
>> Binding Study Group List)
>
> Interesting. Why?
Yeah, I'd call it depressing.
Jeff
- Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Previous message: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- In reply to: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Next in thread: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
- Reply: Sohail Somani: "Re: [boost] Boost.Threads, N2178, N2184, et al"
$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost/include";
include("$include_dir/msg-footer.inc");
?>