From: Sohail Somani (s.somani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-15 14:13:05
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Jeremy Pack
>
> I agree. It would be very compiler dependent to have the library find
> arbitrary classes in a linked library and determine their
> methods. What I
> was thinking of is a bit simpler. It would require a
> reflected class to have
> it's reflected methods declared as such. It would be a bit
> similar to the
> Boost.Python syntax, except that it would, like
> Boost.Extension, require
> only one library entry point and it would need to add some
> stuff for type
> safety, without inducing a lot of runtime overhead.
I see. Perhaps I should get more familiar with Boost.Python. Would have
loved to go to Boost Con.
/me shakes fist at new passport requirements
Sohail