From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-03-11 11:52:12
Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote
>
>> If BOOST_TYPEOF_NATIVE is defined, BOOST_TYPEOF will work w/o type
>> registration through either true native support of the compiler or
>> MSVC-specific trick (in which case MSVC_TYPEOF_HACK is also defined).
>
> Hmmm, I just noticed that this is not named correctly. Should be probably
> BOOST_TYPEOF_MSVC_HACK. This is not a matter of functionality -- just
> compliance to the macro naming rules... Will we have a chance to correct
> this in this release?
Sorry, but no.
Thomas
-- Thomas Witt witt_at_[hidden]