From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-17 04:28:40
Glen Knowles wrote:
>> From John Maddock
>> Personally I would have liked these to have been really explicit:
>>
>> BOOST_CHECK_PERSENTAGE_DIFFERENCE
>> BOOST_CHECK_RELATIVE_DIFFERENCE
>> BOOST_CHECK_EPSILON_DIFFERENCE
>
> I like these names too, although I would spell percentage with a 'c'.
Oooo, blush!
> I've never liked BOOST_CHECK_CLOSE, I keep looking for a matching
> BOOST_CHECK_OPEN.
:-)
John.