From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-02-02 02:39:44
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> These should be marked as expected failures and happily ignored.
>
> Do you have any objections to apply the attached patch to
> libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2
> and only mark the remaining tests as expected to fail?
I think if Boost.Test cannot be built as DLL on msvc-6.5, then:
<toolset>msvc-6.5:<link>static
should go to libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2, not the test Jamfile, thereby
disabling shared libraries of Boost.Test on that compiler completely.
Gennadiy, would you object to such a change?
- Volodya