From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-01-14 07:19:01
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> Tobias Schwinger wrote:
>>
<snip>
>>> 2.
>>>
>>> Although it seems to be the same problem, it's actually a different
>>> one (just a typo - see result_of_iterate.patch). This test fails
>>> with the RC 1.34 version, too:
>>>
>>> typedef int (X::*mem_func_ptr_0)();
>>>
>>> BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT((is_same<
>>> result_of<mem_func_ptr_0(X)>::type,
>>> int>::value));
>>
>>
>> I'll let Doug comment on this one.
>
>
>
> The attached patch fixes both problems. Doug, should I commit (to
> HEAD)? Also see the new test (attached).
>
...and No.2 is corrected in my copy of the RC branch - ready to fire.
Just confirm.
Regards,
Tobias