From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-21 19:13:13
"Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:458B0F43.3050201_at_gmail.com...
> Peter Dimov wrote:
>> It seems that to fix the problem we need to set v9 as default in
>> Boost.Build. I admit that I have no idea how to do that. Searching *.jam
>> for -mcpu turned up nothing. The instruction-set feature doesn't seem to
>> be
>> used by gcc.jam. (The CVS only has Boost.Build v2 now; it could've worked
>> with v1.)
>
> I can add the architecture and cpu options into BBv2, from BBv1. But we
> probably don't want to do that in the 1.34 branch as I don't think we
> want the chance of upsetting testing. Is that reasonable, or is this an
> urgent problem?
As of now Boost.Test doesn't build on Sun with gcc in my environment. IMO
it's pretty important to be fixed
Gennadiy