Boost mailing page: [boost] [in_place_factory] default constructors

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-12-15 23:12:17

Next message: Weapon Liu: "Re: [boost] tuple with methods (was Re: If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serliazation] Thread-safety again"
Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] [in_place_factory] default constructors"
Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] [in_place_factory] default constructors"

AMDG

Is there a good reason why in_place_factory doesn't
provide overloads for zero parameters?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Next message: Weapon Liu: "Re: [boost] tuple with methods (was Re: If boost::fusion is the hammer, then what's the nail?"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Serliazation] Thread-safety again"
Next in thread: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] [in_place_factory] default constructors"
Reply: Fernando Cacciola: "Re: [boost] [in_place_factory] default constructors"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view