From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-07 06:20:05


Currently the Boost.TR1 <memory> fails one conformance test,
bad_weak_ptr::what() returns 'boost::bad_weak_ptr' and it should return
'tr1::bad_weak_ptr'.

Any violent objections against changing it to conform in HEAD?

Any ordinary objections against changing it in 1.34 as well?