From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-11-01 17:55:21
Roland Schwarz wrote:
> 1) No mention of thread local storage. Why?
One reason is that we hope that the language will provide it. Another is
that I haven't had time to prototype my ideas for a thread_specific<X>
template. There might be no need, depending on the evolution of the __thread
proposal. We'll just write
__thread X x;
(possibly using another keyword.)