From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-12 17:09:17
On 10/12/06, Arkadiy Vertleyb <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> More importantly, according
> to the standard, the basic_string class destructor is not virtual, and so
> basic_string is not intended for derivation.
Wouldn't this only matter if super_string added data members (it
doesn't AFAICT) and was being deleted via pointers to
std::basic_string?
-- Caleb Epstein