From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-10-06 11:29:11
John Maddock wrote:
> Jeff Garland wrote:
>> Marcin Kalicinski wrote:
>>
>>> I agree it might be beneficial to put the library in the CVS, even
>>> though the docs are not up to date yet. But I don't yet have access
>>> to the main CVS, so how should we handle that?
>>
>> Please send your sourceforge id to the moderator list
>> boost-owner_at_[hidden] and one of us will add you in.
>
> Before we get too far on: only reviewed and *accepted* libraries should be
> in Boost cvs. Work in progress should go in the sandbox:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost-sandbox/
>
> Or have I misunderstood the intent here? It happens often :-)
Property Tree was accepted....somehow that didn't make the News on the front
page, but it was recorded here:
http://listarchives.boost.org/boost-announce/2006/05/0092.php
Jeff