From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-14 22:28:39
"Manfred Doudar" wrote
> Please see my brief reply to Geoffrey Irving; ... and apologies for any
> apprehension caused, but its my fault - the best name to use really
> depends on context.
Then I guess in fusion you would do :
fusion::inner_product<SequenceA, SequenceB,Function1,Function2>{...}
fusion::dot_product<SequenceA, SequenceB>
: fusion::inner_product<
SequenceA,SequenceB,
boost:functional::multiplies,boost::functional::plus
>{};
regards
Andy Little