From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-11 08:17:00
Zak Kipling wrote:
>> From discussion on the above bug page, it appears unclear whether
>> this
> or not this code is actually legal... has the patch broken something
> which should be expected to work, or are the existing versions of gcc
> and Comeau accepting illegal code?
It looks borderline to me: I suspect that gcc is correct in complaining
about this, of course that doesn't mean it *has* to diagnose this as an
error, simply that it is probably permitted to do so.
Any other opinions?
John.