From: Jeremy Day (jeremy.day_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-09-01 08:12:21
On 9/1/06, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> It's not really the same as making point actually *be* a conforming
> fusion sequence, in some sense, is it? You've sorta "cheated" by
> giving it a kind of implicitly-recognized conversion into a view.
Don't you need the functionality that Joel describes if you deal with code
from a library that you didn't write, such as anything provided by
Microsoft? Or if you are dealing with legacy code?
Jeremy