From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-09 09:17:50
Stephen Hewitt <shewitt.au <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> I originally posted this message in Boost-users but I think Boost-developers
> is probably more suitable. It regards a non-standard extension which I think
> is being used in Boost.Serialization. I have mailed the author (and
> Boost-users) but he feels the construct is legal.
I think you have to change it a little to make it legal:
> The "make_nvp" function looks like as follows:
> [CODE]
> nvp<T> make_nvp(const char * name, T & t){
> return nvp<T>(name, t);
> }
> [/CODE]
If the return type is "const vnp<T>" it should work.
I'm wondering why the orginal code compiles on other compilers.
best regards
Thorsten