[boost] [mpl] BOOST_MPL_AUX_LAMBDA_SUPPORT and non-type template parms

From: JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-26 19:27:39

Suppose we've got the following:

template<typename T, int N>
struct foo
{
  typedef ... type;
};

and we want to add MPL lambda support for broken compilers.
Should we have #1 or #2?

//1
template<typename T, int N>
struct foo
{
  BOOST_MPL_AUX_LAMBDA_SUPPORT(1,foo,(T))
  typedef ... type;
};

//2
template<typename T, int N>
struct foo
{
  BOOST_MPL_AUX_LAMBDA_SUPPORT(2,foo,(T,N))
  typedef ... type;
};

The docs on BOOST_MPL_AUX_LAMBDA_SUPPORT seem not to
take into account class templates where some params
are non-type. Maybe the macro does not work for them?

Thank you,

Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo