From: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard (jbms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-25 19:09:17
Dave Dribin <dave-ml_at_[hidden]> writes:
> [snip]
> Well, if I haven't convinced you by this point, hopefully at you'll
> at least consider using a #define to disable constructors for those
> people that *do* find a real-world use for such classes in unions.
Perhaps the solution is to support both use cases by having a separate
type for each of the two use cases.
-- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard