From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-24 04:48:15
"Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:BAY104-DAV12C98347CDD0AAAA842E1CBF660_at_phx.gbl...
> On 7/17/06 11:45 AM, "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> If boost moves to SVN then Quan will follow after watching their progress,
>> but
>> meanwhile Quan should stay in step with Boost IMO.
>
> Why bother? I don't think you can glom files from one CVS database into
> another. There's no point in keeping this level of compatibility, so you
> might as well switch to the modernized alternative before you gain many
> revisions. (Ironically, I think that SVN _does_ allow some degree of
> cross-database glomming.)
The reason is pretty simple. I am no expert on Version Control. If Quan gets
accepted to Boost then I will need to know CVS in order to work effectively. If
and when Boost moves to Subversion I will have to learn it, however as I
understand it CVS is the more tricky system to learn and at that stage I will
have more understanding of version control so the move should not be as
difficult.
regards
Andy Little