From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-18 11:42:41
loufoque wrote:
> Manfred Doudar wrote :
>
>
>> However, what I could not pick out is whether or not the proposed tree
>> can or intends to support a node owning multiple parents(?)
>>
>
> AFAIK when a node has multiple parents it's not a tree, it's a graph.
> I may be wrong though.
>
You're not wrong. A "tree" in which nodes have multiple parents is a
graph; actually, it is (I think) a directed graph.