From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-07-09 18:58:04
Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>What I'm trying to say, but seems to be failing miserably, is that
>failed<T> deriving from T and exception_info is too an implementation
>detail.
>
No, it's not. It's a key promise of the library that both T& and
exception_info& can be caught, i.e. that the object returned by
failed<>() derives from both. It's part of the interface.
Sebastian Redl