From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 18:48:41
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> What interface would you consider appropriate? Right now
>
> bjam ... define=_SECURE_SCL=0 ...
>
> works with BBv2. Do you want some kind of more descriptive syntax?
>
> bjam checked_iterators=no
>
> ?? That wouldn't be appropriate if _SECURE_SCL=0 has effects other
> than turning off iterator checking.
IIRC, using _SECURE_SCL means that VC8 will replace some calls to
strcpy, et. al. with the MS str***_s equivalents. There may be other
changes as well.
- Reece
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/