From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-15 13:22:09
"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Heh, I think we ought to think very carefully about changing our
>> default.
>
> I agree: normally our default is the same as the compiler's default,
> if you want to do something out of the ordinary then it's up to you
> to compile the lib's the way you want them. I don't think there's
> any way we can provide every possible binary.
a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me. Maybe
s/carefully/seriously/?
b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when
the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com