From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-06-13 23:38:06
"Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>
>> Andy has indeed graciously accepted criticism of the documentation,
>> for which I commend him.
>
> Your criticism mainly concerned the C++ Concepts section of the documentation
> for PQS. What might help is some examples of what you consider good C++ Concept
> documentation.
<snip>
Sorry about the overquoting in my other reply to this message; it was
user error in my mailer :(
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com