From: Darren Cook (darren_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-29 19:34:55
> Here are results for cvs head version with your modification, which show that
> your analysis was correct:
It would be interesting to see how your results compare to Google's
(open source) hash map:
http://goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net/
http://goog-sparsehash.sourceforge.net/doc/performance.html
I've not used them but they seem to give some good improvements (memory
or speed, but not both) over std_hash and std_map.
Darren