From: Christopher Kohlhoff (chris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-05-08 07:29:56
Hi Felipe,
Felipe Magno de Almeida <felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Dropping asio prefix should be thinked more carefully. While
> the default implementation wouldnt clash with user code,
> user's customization could collapse with its own free
> functions. Or even worse, asio could find through ADL
> functions that wasnt made to be allocation customization for
> asio.
Yep, fair enough - it's probably better to be safe. Although it
does raise the question of what to call the functions in the
proposal for TR2. Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Chris