From: Andreas Pokorny (andreas.pokorny_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-26 12:12:56
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Paul A Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> | [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Chris Uzdavinis
> | Sent: 26 April 2006 15:10
> | To: boost_at_[hidden]
> | Subject: Re: [boost] there already is an ASIO.
> |
> | "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvdspek_at_[hidden]> writes:
> |
> | >> Also, asio is not an acronym
> | >
> | > In what way is it not?
> |
> | If it were an acronym, for what word would the "s" stand?
> |
> | "Asychronous S(omething) Input Output"?
>
> Or CIO for Chronous Input Output?
>
> to escape from the async-ness which doesn't seem important in the bigger
> picture into which this library promises to fit in future?
>
> But I still feel we can do better still...
Hm, you mean like "chronic input output"?
Andreas Pokorny