From: Jorge Lodos (lodos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-21 10:53:53
> I think it is quite hard to require that a parser for config
> file X must exists for us to accept the library. It puts a
> great deal of burden on the library author. Our focus should
> be on the general core interface of the library s.t. we get a
> flexible solution that can be useful in many areas.
>
The requisites I meant were the ones enumerated, namely
1. The ability to load/save properties independently, not as a whole.
2. A documented (for library extensibility) parser interface allowing parser
developers to accomplish (1).
Sorry if this was not clear enough.
Cheers
Jorge