From: Paul Giaccone (paulg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-20 06:03:49
John Maddock wrote:
>>template<std::size_t TAlign, std::size_t Align>
>>struct is_aligned
>>{
>> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(bool,
>> value = (TAlign >= Align) & (TAlign % Align == 0)
>> ^^^ <<---- here!
>> );
>>};
>>
>>Should it be "&&" instead of "&"?
>>
>>
>
>Logically yes: however when you think about it, it actually makes no
>practical difference, and I believe it was done that way deliberately as a
>workaround for certain broken compilers that choke on logical expressions
>"&&" inside integral constant expressions. So for now I'm going to leave it
>alone.
>
>
Perhaps a comment to this effect could be added to the code to show that
it is intentional and not an error or oversight.
Paul