Re: [boost] Report from Berlin C++ Standards Committee meeting

From: Yuval Ronen (ronen_yuval_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-11 08:20:58

David Abrahams wrote:
>   optional<T> string_to<T>(x)
> 
> seems more likely.

Yes, looks good.
What is the status of optional<T> w.r.t to the standard, anyway? I hope 
it's on its way...